|
Post by ladydawgs96 on Jun 23, 2008 14:44:26 GMT -5
Well, you know the depth of the '09 draft is astounding. We just want to make sure that we can have as many picks as possible next year
|
|
|
Post by jordan3 on Jun 23, 2008 14:54:59 GMT -5
While the depth of next year's draft is very good, I don't know if we'd know what to do with it if we had every pick in the draft.
I'm baffled that they would trade Camille Little. She got limited playing time, but always played hard when she was on the court. She was a great part of San Antonio's team (alongside Hammon, Young, Riley, Johnson at the time). How can you justify trading somebody without even given them the opportunity to prove themselves? I would have much rather seen Feenstra gone. I would have been ok even with Choima being part of a trade. Camille Little traded? Are you serious?
Seattle just gained another weapon. With Griffith hurt and inconsistency with Robinson and Ely, I bet she gets a decent amount of PT now.
If there are any more trades in the works, I hope Feenstra is the next to go. Also, we need to go out and get Carla Thomas since she is not playing. We need to also look for a post player on another team that isn't playing much, but could be very productive for us.
I can't wait to see the next ass-tastic move our front office makes.
|
|
|
Post by bayougrl on Jun 23, 2008 16:57:13 GMT -5
Jordan3 you said it all. I can call about 4 or 5 players that could have gone before Camille. Anyone knows why they didn't pick up Carla Thomas in the beginning. I went to the open practice when LA was in town for the presean game and was impressed with Carla. I couldn't make the presean game and gave my cousin the tickets and when she came to one of the regular season games with me she asked what happen to Carla. I'm trying to give the teams decisions makers (coaches, manager etc) some time to get it together but they are making some POOR decisions.
|
|
|
Post by lattafan on Jun 23, 2008 22:38:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by afoundingfan on Jun 24, 2008 7:02:56 GMT -5
I'm wondering if there was something else going on behind the scenes w/Camille. I'd watch the Seattle blogs and papers for the next few days/weeks to see what she has to say about this move.
|
|
|
Post by afoundingfan on Jun 24, 2008 21:59:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by civic97 on Jun 25, 2008 13:23:11 GMT -5
Seattle has been struggling a bit this season even with a star-studded lineup...I think we may have given them exactly what they need to become a true threat.
|
|
|
Post by jordan3 on Jun 25, 2008 15:14:03 GMT -5
At least Agler understands what Camille can bring to a team. Seattle has more talent than we do on this team, but Agler still sees how Camille can fit in now and in the future. This just proves we gave up (or shall I say lost) yet another player that could have been really good for us in the future (and now had she been given the PT).
|
|
|
Post by jaye on Jun 25, 2008 18:38:09 GMT -5
we're thingyed..... darn censor..... we're richard-ed ......
|
|
|
Post by cheynse23 on Jun 25, 2008 21:42:37 GMT -5
Coach Agler wanted to take Camille out of her misery. Way to look out for a hard worker Coach. The Dream coaches didn't appreciate what they had.
|
|
|
Post by afoundingfan on Jul 3, 2008 11:36:32 GMT -5
What Little said to the Seattle Times about being traded:
"I was surprised," said Little, who was traded from Atlanta for the Storm's 2008 second-round draft pick. "I was just at home watching TV when I got the call. I was excited. I came from the bottom to the top."
|
|
|
Post by afoundingfan on Jul 3, 2008 21:34:13 GMT -5
Coach Agler wanted to take Camille out of her misery. Way to look out for a hard worker Coach. The Dream coaches didn't appreciate what they had. You may be right. I spoke to someone tonight who said she had some insider info and said that Camille and Meadors did not get along.
|
|
|
Post by scarab on Jul 28, 2008 21:46:04 GMT -5
|
|